Resources
White Papers and
Research
Articles
Books
Cases and Opinions
Court Rules
Ethics Opinions
Reports
White Papers and Research
Bibliography on Self-Representation and "Unbundling" of Legal Services
Cases and Materials on Pro Se Litigation and Related Issues by Jona Goldschmidt, Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Justice, Loyla University, Chicago, Prepared for the ABA Lawyers' Conference Annual Meeting, Tuscon, Arizona, May, 1997.
Evaluation of Maryland Assisted Pro Se Project
Articles
And Such Small Portions: Limited Performance
Agreements and the Cost/Quality/Access Trade-Off, David A. Hyman and
Charles Silver, Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Vol. 11, page 959.
Attorney-Client Relationships in Cyberspace:
The Perils and the Promise, Catherine J. Lanctot, Duke Law Journal, Vol.
49, page 147 (1999) http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?49+Duke+L.+J.+147
Divorce Litigants Without Lawyers,
Robert B. Yegge, The Judge痴 Journal.
Ethical and Procedural Implications of
"Ghostwriting" for Pro Se Litigants: Toward Increased Access to Civil
Justice, John C. Rothermich, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 67, page 2687, 1999.
How Are Courts Handling Pro Se Litigants,
Jona Goldsmidt, Judicature, July-August 1998.
Limited Performance Agreements: Should
Clients Get What They Pay For?, Fred. C. Zacharias, Georgetown Journal of
Legal Ethics, Vol. 11, page 915.
Limiting the Scope of Your Representation:
Questions of Cost, Candor, and Disclosure, by Barrie Althoff, Washington
State Bar News, July 1997.
Limiting the Scope of Your Representation:
When Your Client Wants, or Can Afford, Only Part of You, by Barrie Althoff,
Washington State Bar News, June 1997.
No Legal Advice from Court Personnel: What
Does It Mean?, John Grecaon, Judges Journal, 1995.
Redefining Attorney-Client Roles: Unbundling
and Moderate Income Elderly Clients, Mary Helen McNeal, Wake Forest Law
Review, Vol. 32, page 295, Summer 1997.
Report on the Working Group on Limited Legal
Assistance, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 67, page 1819, 1999.
Rethinking the Full-Service Representation
Model: A Maryland Experiment, Michael Millemann, et al., Clearinghouse
Review, March-April 1997.
Unbundling Legal Services, Dianne Molvig,
The Wisconsin Lawyer, Vol. 70, No. 9, Sept. 1997, http://www.wisbar.org/wislawmag/archive/sept97/bundle.html
Unbundling of the Legal Services and the
Family Lawyer, Forrest S. Mosten, Family Law Quarterly, vol. 28, Fall 1994.
Unbundling Your Services Makes Some Clients
Happy, Leigh Perkins, Lawyers Weekly USA, Dec. 18, 1995.
Books
Fordham Law Review Special Issue: Conference
on the Delivery of Legal Services to Low-Income Persons: Professional and
Ethical Issues, Vol. LXVII, No. 5, April 1999.
Meeting the Challenge of Pro Se Litigation: A
Report and Guidebook for Judges and Court Managers, Goldschmidt, Mahoney,
Solomon and Green, American Judicature Society, 1998.
Pro Per Assistance: A Manual For Legal
Services and Pro Bono Providers, Office of Legal Services, State Bar of
California, 1994.
The Pro Per Counseling Handbook,
Standing Committee on Legal Services to Middle Income Persons, State Bar of
California, 1994.
Responding to the Needs of the
Self-Represented Divorce Litigant, ABA Standing Committee on the Delivery
of Legal Services, 1994.
Self-Representation in Divorce Cases: A
Report for the ABA Standing Committee on the Delivery of Legal Services,
Sales, Beck and Hann, ABA 1993.
Cases and
Opinions
Opinion of the Attorney General of the State of Maryland Opinion No. 95-056 (December 19, 1995) Concerning Whether Law Advocates Who Provide Services to Victims of Domestic Violence Engage in the Unauthorized Practice of Law
Nichols v. Keller, 19 Cal. Rptr. 2d 601
(1993)
Johnson V. Board of County Comm池s,
868 F. Supp. 1226 (D. Colo. 1994)
Clarke v. U.S., 955 F. Supp. 593 (E.D.
Va. 1997)
Laremont-Lopez v. Southeastern Tidewater
Opportunity Ctr, 968 F. Supp. 1075 (E.D. Va. 1997)
Ricotta v. California, 4 F. Supp. 2d 961
(S.D. Cal. 1998)
Court Rules
ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct, Rule
1.2(c) Scope of Representation
Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure 11, Signing of
Pleadings
Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure 121, Sec. 1-1.
Entry of Appearance and Withdrawal
Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure 311. Signing of
Pleadings
Colorado Rules of Professional Responsibility 1.2
Scope and Objectives of Representation
Colorado Rules of Professional Responsibility 4.2
Communications with Person Represented by Counsel
Colorado Rules of Professional Responsibility 4.3
Dealing with Unrepresented Person
Ethics Opinions
ABA Formal Op. 96-399 (1996)
ABA Formal Op. 347 (1981)
ABA Informal Op. 1414 (1978)
ABA Informal Op. 1359 (1976)
Alaska Bar Ass地 Ethics Op. 78-5 (1978)
Alaska Bar Ass地 Ethics Op. 93-1 (1993)
Arizona State Bar Ass地 Op. 91-3 (1991)
Colorado Bar Ass地 Ethics Op. 101 (1998)
Florida State Bar Ass地 Op. 92-1 (1992)
Illinois State Bar Ass地 Prof. Conduct Comm.
Op. 849 (1983)
Illinois State Bar Ass地 Prof. Conduct Comm.
Op. 85-6 (1985)
Iowa State Bar Ass地 Op. 96-31 (1997)
Los Angeles Cnty Bar Ass地 Prof. Resp. and
Ethics Comm. Ethics Op. 483
Kansas Ethics Op. 92-06 (1992)
Kentucky Bar Ass地 Op. E-343 (1991)
New York State Bar Ass地 Op. 613 (1990)
New York State Bar Ass地 Op. 643
Ass地 of the Bar of the City of New York Formal
Op. 1987-2 (1987)
North Carolina State Bar RPC 114 (1991)
Oregon State Bar Ass地 Bd. of Governors Op.
1994-138 (1994)
South Carolina Bar Ethics Advisory Comm. Op.
82-30 (1983)
Bd. of Prof. Resp. Of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn. Op.
93-F-130 (1993)
Utah State Bar Ethics Advisory Op. Comm. Op.
96-07 (1996)
Utah State Bar Ethics Advisory Op. Comm. Op.
96-12 (1997)
Standing Comm. On Legal Ethics, Virginia State
Bar Legal Ethics Op. 1127 (1988)
Standing Comm. On Legal Ethics, Virginia State
Bar Legal Ethics Op. 1592 (1994)
Pro Se Projects
The American Judicature Society (http://www.ajs.org/)
hosts the Pro Se Forum to facilitate discussion on pro se issues among court
administrators and others.
Reports
Access to Justice for All Task Force Report,
State Bar of Michigan, April 2000.
Agenda for Access: The American People and
Civil Justice: Final Report of the Implications of the Comprehensive Legal Needs
Study, ABA, 1996.
And Justice For All: Fulfilling the Promise
of Access to Civil Justice in California, California State Bar, 1996.
Boston Bar Association Task Force on
Unrepresented Litigants, 1998.
Commission on the Delivery of Legal Services
Final Report and Recommendations, State Bar of Wisconsin, June 1996.
Pro Se Litigation Committee Report and
Recommendations, Judicial Council of Georgia, 1998.
Office of the State Court Administrator
Report to the Florida Legislature on Family Court Self-Help Programs, March
1, 1999.
Oregon Family Law Legal Services Commission
Report to the Oregon Legislative Assembly, Jan. 1999.
Report of the Minnesota Conference on Chief
Justices Committee on the Treatment of Litigants and Pro Se Litigation,
April 1996.
|